Blue Guardian Futures Review 2026: A Rule-by-Rule Teardown

By Marcel Hambálek · Senior Trader, For Traders

Blue Guardian Futures is the CME futures prop trading arm of Blue Guardian, offering evaluation and instant funding accounts on simulated capital across ES, NQ, GC and CL. Its defining features are an intraday trailing drawdown on evaluation accounts, a published 24-hour payout target, and account sizes that typically run from $25K to $150K in simulated buying power — rules verified October 2026.

Key takeaways

• Blue Guardian Futures trades CME products on simulated capital — it is a prop trading firm and educational platform, not a broker, and no evaluation trade touches live exchange order flow.
• The drawdown model is the single most important rule to understand: an intraday trailing drawdown punishes giving back open profit, while an end-of-day model lets a winning trade breathe.
• A worked $50K simulation shows most breaches happen not on a big losing day but on the third mediocre day after a strong open — the trail ratchets up and never comes back down.
• The 24-hour payout claim describes the firm's processing target, not a guarantee; Trustpilot reports show speed is generally good but KYC and first-payout checks add real days.
• Against Apex Trader Funding, MyFundedFutures and For Traders, Blue Guardian Futures competes on price and platform choice rather than on rule flexibility.
• Firm rules change frequently in futures prop — everything here was verified October 2026 and should be re-checked against the live rules page before you buy.

Watch: related video

What Is Blue Guardian Futures?

Blue Guardian Futures is the CME futures prop trading arm of Blue Guardian, running evaluation and instant funding challenges on simulated capital against contract-based products instead of percentage-based forex pairs. If you've already looked at Blue Guardian's main FX offering, this is the sibling program built specifically for futures traders who want to trade ES, NQ, GC and CL rather than EURUSD and gold spot.

How the futures arm differs from Blue Guardian's forex side

The split matters more than it looks on the surface. Blue Guardian's forex side runs on an MT5-style setup with percentage-based drawdown — your max loss is calculated as a percentage of account equity, and you're trading FX pairs and metals CFDs. The futures arm works on dollar-based drawdown tied to contract specs set by CME Group. Instead of "don't lose 5% of equity," you're working against a fixed dollar trailing drawdown that moves with your peak equity intraday. It's a different mental model — you're thinking in ticks and point value per contract, not pips and lot size.

What you're actually trading: CME products on simulated capital

Every trade you place runs on simulated capital — there's no live order hitting a CME order book, but the contracts you're trading are the real ones, priced off live CME Group data. In practice, four products carry most of the volume:

• ES (E-mini S&P 500) and NQ (E-mini Nasdaq-100) — the core index contracts most evaluations are built around
• MES and MNQ micro futures — one-tenth the size of their E-mini counterparts, used for position sizing granularity when you don't want full-contract risk
• GC gold futures — for traders who want commodity volatility without switching to spot gold
• CL crude oil futures — the highest-volatility name on the list, favored by traders comfortable with wider intraday swings

Micros matter here more than people admit upfront — scaling from 1 MES to 1 ES is a 10x jump in point value, so the micro tier gives you room to size up gradually instead of jumping straight into full contract risk.

Account sizes and buying power at a glance

Account tiers determine both your simulated buying power and how many contracts you can hold at once. Specs below reflect what's published as of October 2026 — Blue Guardian, like every futures prop firm, adjusts contract limits and drawdown figures periodically, so confirm current numbers on their site before funding an evaluation.

Buying power scales with account size, but your real constraint is the contract limit, not the dollar figure — plan your position sizing around "how many ES can I hold," not just the account balance on the dashboard.

Blue Guardian Futures Rules, Translated Into Trading Behaviour

The short version: hit the profit target without breaching the intraday trailing drawdown or the daily loss limit, keep any single day under the consistency cap, and go flat before the session closes on CL and GC — miss any one of those and the evaluation resets. On paper that's five bullet points. In practice it's five separate questions you'll ask yourself at 2pm when a trade is working and you're not sure whether to add or walk away.

Profit target and minimum trading days

Blue Guardian Futures sets the profit target as a straight percentage of your starting simulated balance, with a minimum trading-day requirement layered on top — so hitting the number on day one doesn't fast-track you through the blue guardian futures evaluation. You still need those extra sessions logged. Treat the minimum days as a feature, not friction: it forces you to show the target wasn't a single lucky NFP spike on NQ.

Daily loss limit and how it's calculated

This is the question every trader asks and most skip reading the fine print on: does the daily loss limit measure from yesterday's closing balance, or from today's intraday high? On Blue Guardian Futures accounts it resets off the prior day's close — not your floating high-water mark intraday. That matters because an unrealised drawdown mid-session that you recover from before close doesn't count against the daily number, but a closed loss that pushes you through the line does, even if you were up earlier in the day. Know this before you're staring at an open ES position wondering if you're already in breach.

The consistency rule and why it catches good traders

The consistency rule is where traders with genuinely good edges get tripped up at payout, not during the evaluation. It caps any single day's profit as a percentage of your total — a common structure runs around 20-30%. Run the arithmetic: if your target is $3,000 and the cap sits at 25%, no single day can contribute more than $750 toward that total. Bag $1,500 on one GC breakout day and you haven't failed — but that day now only counts as $750 toward target, and you need more sessions to dilute it down under the cap. Good trades don't get punished; disproportionate trades do.

News, overnight and holiday restrictions

CL and GC are where restrictions bite hardest because they gap the most around news and rollovers. Blue Guardian Futures rules generally require you to be flat ahead of major scheduled releases and restrict overnight holding futures prop positions into CME holiday closes, where spreads widen and liquidity thins fast. Carry a GC position into an unscheduled gap and the trailing drawdown doesn't care that you were "right" on direction by morning — it measures what happened to your equity, not your thesis. Check the current session calendar directly against CME Group's published holiday and halt schedule before you hold anything overnight.

Every figure above reflects Blue Guardian Futures' published rule set as verified in October 2026 — percentages and caps on prop evaluations do get revised, so confirm current numbers on their rules page before you fund an account.

The Drawdown Model: Intraday Trailing vs End-of-Day

Blue Guardian Futures evaluation accounts run an intraday trailing drawdown — your fail line tracks the highest balance your account has touched, intraday or at close, and it only ever moves up. That's the single detail that trips up traders who assume "drawdown" means the same thing everywhere. It doesn't. An end-of-day drawdown model only resets or ratchets based on your closing balance; an intraday trailing model locks in every new high the second you touch it, even if you give the gain straight back before the close.

How an intraday trailing drawdown actually moves

Under Blue Guardian Futures drawdown rules, the max DD figure (expressed as a dollar cap, e.g. 5% of starting balance on a $50K plan) is subtracted from your highest-ever equity point, not your last close. Spike $1,500 above your starting balance intraday, even for thirty seconds on an NFP wick, and your fail line permanently rises by $1,500 — whether or not that trade survives to the close. This is the core end-of-day drawdown vs intraday trailing drawdown distinction: end-of-day models forgive intraday noise; trailing models remember it forever.

Worked example: blowing a $50K account in three ordinary sessions

Assume a $50,000 evaluation with a $2,500 max DD (5%) for illustration. Three unremarkable sessions — no blowup candle, no revenge trade — show how fast the cushion disappears.

Net P&L after three days: down just $300. Yet the trader is sitting on only $900 of cushion against a $2,500 cap — more than 60% of the room is gone. That's the ratchet at work: the threshold never cared about the flat day or the small red day on their own; it cared about the intraday high nobody banked.

Where the trail stops trailing — the buffer explained

Most trailing models, Blue Guardian Futures included, stop ratcheting once your account reaches a defined profit buffer above starting balance — commonly once you're sitting at or above the profit target region. Below that point, every tick of new equity high raises the floor; above it, the floor typically locks at breakeven-plus-buffer and stays there. Confirm the exact buffer trigger on the current rules page before you fund, since caps and buffer levels get revised — but structurally, that lock is the point where the trailing threat stops being your biggest enemy.

How to size and place stops under a trailing model

Trailing drawdown punishes size taken before you've built any buffer. Practical adjustments:

• Size in micros (MES, MNQ, MGC) for the first several sessions — futures contract sizing in micros keeps a single intraday spike from ratcheting the threshold past what a later red day can absorb.
• Set stops at 1.5× ATR below entry, not the round number — the round number gets hunted first, and a tight, arbitrary stop just gets you stopped and re-entered, racking up slippage without moving your high-water mark.
• Bank intraday highs. If you're up meaningfully mid-session, trail your own stop up or take partials — don't let a runner retrace to flat. Under end-of-day drawdown, that retrace costs you nothing; under Blue Guardian Futures' trailing drawdown, the damage is already locked in.

Blue Guardian Futures Instant Funding: How It Really Works

Blue Guardian Futures Instant Funding skips the evaluation phase entirely — you pay upfront, get a funded account on simulated capital under the same drawdown rules, and start generating performance rewards from day one, but the fee runs several multiples of a standard evaluation. It's not a shortcut around the risk framework. It's a different way to pay for access to it.

What you skip and what you don't

Instant Funding removes the profit target gate — there's no Step 1 or Step 2 number you need to hit before you're trading for keeps. Everything else that defines a funded account stays in place: the intraday trailing drawdown ceiling, the daily loss limit, and a consistency requirement that still caps how much of your total result can come from a single outsized day. You also typically get tighter contract limits on instant accounts versus an evaluation account of the same simulated size — Blue Guardian sizes risk more conservatively when there's no track record behind the account. And first payout isn't immediate — expect a waiting period (commonly 14-30 days depending on the current terms) before your first withdrawal request clears, even if you're sitting on rewards from week one.

Cost versus an evaluation path

The real comparison isn't instant funding versus one evaluation attempt — it's instant funding versus the realistic number of attempts it takes most traders to pass. If you fail an evaluation twice before passing on the third try, you've paid three evaluation fees plus the time spent resetting each time.

Run your own numbers against the published evaluation fee before assuming instant funding is "expensive." If your pass rate on evaluations is genuinely low, two failed attempts can land close to — or past — the instant funding fee anyway, without you ever touching a funded account.

Who instant funding genuinely suits

Instant funding rewards traders who already know their size, their stop logic, and their max daily loss cold — traders who've proven the process on a demo or a previous evaluation and don't need a gated profit target to tell them they're ready. It is not a way to buy past a process that keeps failing. If you've busted three evaluations on the same mistake — moving stops, oversizing after a loss — paying more upfront for the same drawdown rules just means the capital at risk (even simulated) scales up before the habit is fixed.

Payouts: Does the 24-Hour Claim Hold Up?

Short answer: yes, but the 24-hour number only covers one leg of a much longer trip. Blue Guardian Futures advertises a 24-hour payout target measured from approval to funds hitting your payment rail — not from the moment you click "request." KYC verification, first-payout review and the bank or crypto settlement window all sit outside that clock. If you're sizing your expectations around "I'll have cash in a day," you'll want the fuller sequence below.

The published payout mechanics

The real journey looks like this: hit your minimum trading days, clear the profit threshold on your funded account, then submit a payout request inside the published request window (typically tied to a bi-weekly or monthly cadence, depending on account type). From there, compliance reviews the request — this is where KYC documentation gets checked, especially on a first-time payout — and once approved, the 24-hour transfer target starts. That last leg is genuinely fast for most futures prop firms using standard payment rails. The bottleneck almost never lives in the transfer itself; it lives in everything upstream.

What happens to your account balance after a payout

This is the part most review pages skip. After performance rewards are paid out, your funded account balance resets to a baseline tied to your original account size — not to your post-profit high balance. The critical question for sizing your next cycle is whether the drawdown buffer resets with it. On Blue Guardian Futures' trailing drawdown structure, the buffer recalculates off the new baseline, which means your trailing stop-out level moves back down with the reset. Practically: don't treat day one of a new payout cycle like you've still got the cushion you built up before the withdrawal. Size as if you're starting fresh, because your drawdown math is starting fresh too.

What Trustpilot reviewers actually report on speed

Scanning Trustpilot sentiment on Blue Guardian Futures payout speed, the pattern is consistent with the rest of the futures prop firm payout speed conversation industry-wide: complaints cluster almost entirely around the first payout and documentation friction, not around refusal to pay. Traders report smooth, same-day transfers on repeat payouts once KYC is on file — the friction is front-loaded into that initial verification step. That's a materially different story than "firm doesn't pay," and it's worth separating the two before you let a single slow first-cycle review scare you off. Submit your KYC documents early, before you're sitting on a profit threshold you're eager to cash out, and the 24-hour claim holds up about as well as any payout cadence in this space.

Blue Guardian Futures vs Apex, MyFundedFutures and For Traders

On cost per simulated dollar, Blue Guardian Futures is competitive with the rest of the futures prop field; on rule flexibility, it sits a step behind firms that offer an end-of-day drawdown option. That's the trade-off to understand before you pick a firm — you're weighing a trailing drawdown that locks in your favor against static or EOD alternatives that give you more room to hold overnight.

Full specs comparison table

Blue Guardian Futures vs Apex Trader Funding

The real battleground in blue guardian futures vs apex trader funding isn't the rulebook — both run trailing drawdowns and similar profit targets — it's volume and pricing cycles. Apex Trader Funding runs aggressive discount promotions almost continuously and funds a far larger number of accounts overall, which means more data points, more community chatter, and more precedent on how support handles edge cases. Blue Guardian's trailing threshold locks once you hit your target balance the same way Apex's does, so neither firm gives you a free pass to give back unrealized gains on a winning streak. If you're optimizing purely for entry cost during a promo window, Apex usually wins; if you want a tighter, less crowded support queue, Blue Guardian Futures holds its own.

Blue Guardian Futures vs MyFundedFutures

In blue guardian futures vs myfundedfutures, the deciding factor for most traders is the drawdown option. MyFundedFutures lets you choose an End-of-Day drawdown calculation on select plans — your floor resets at the close rather than trailing your intraday high, which matters a lot if you swing positions past the session. Blue Guardian Futures doesn't offer that choice; everything trails intraday. MyFundedFutures also markets a faster path to payout on its accelerated plans, though Blue Guardian's ~24-hour cycle is already near the front of the pack. If you're a swing-style futures trader on ES or GC, the EOD option is worth the trade-off even if other terms are a wash.

Where For Traders fits for multi-asset traders

Here's the honest comparison: our futures line at For Traders is newer and our contract menu narrower than Apex's deep CME roster. Where we earn a look is the unified account — a trader running XAUUSD and US100 on a Two-Step Challenge can bring CME futures under the same login, same risk dashboard, one performance reward cycle, instead of juggling separate logins and separate drawdown rules across firms like Blue Guardian Futures, Topstep, or Take Profit Trader. If futures is the only market you'll ever touch, a futures-only specialist may fit you better. If gold and index futures are part of a broader multi-asset playbook, that's the gap For Traders is built to close — check the For Traders futures challenge specs directly against whichever firm you're shortlisting for best futures prop firms 2026.

Platforms, Data Feeds and Execution Quality

Blue Guardian Futures platforms run on standard CME infrastructure — NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower, and Rithmic connectivity — so your edge is decided less by the platform skin and more by which data feed your strategy actually needs. A swing trader holding ES overnight doesn't care about tick-by-tick DOM granularity. A scalper fading the NQ open absolutely does.

Supported platforms: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower, Rithmic

Blue Guardian Futures gives you the same lineup most futures prop firms offer: NinjaTrader for chart-based system traders who live in indicators and strategy builders, Tradovate for a lightweight browser/desktop combo, and Quantower for traders who want a modern DOM and order-flow tools in one package. Rithmic sits underneath as the data/execution layer many of these platforms connect through — it's infrastructure, not a front-end you trade from directly.

Rithmic vs Tradovate data: what changes on your DOM

This is where traders get tripped up. Rithmic feeds typically give you deeper tick granularity and a more responsive DOM — every print, every size change, updates in near real-time. That matters if you're scalping NQ off order-flow signals: imbalance, absorption, iceberg footprints. Tradovate's native data is perfectly fine for chart-based entries and swing structure on ES, but if your edge depends on reading the tape tick-by-tick, a thinner feed can mean you're reacting a beat late. Match the feed to the job — don't pay for order-flow-grade data if you're trading daily pivots on a 15-minute chart.

Data fees, slippage and fill quality in simulation

Market data fees are a recurring line item across the industry — whether they sit with the trader or get bundled into the challenge fee varies by firm, so confirm this directly in Blue Guardian Futures' current fee schedule before you commit to a feed. Don't assume it's free just because the evaluation fee was.

On fills: simulated execution will not perfectly mirror live CME fills, especially around the 9:30 ET cash open or an FOMC release. Simulated environments generally fill at or near the quoted price with less slippage than you'll see in real liquidity gaps, so don't let a clean simulated backtest convince you a strategy is immune to slippage once it's live. Build in a slippage buffer when you size stops around high-volatility windows — treat the sim as a rules-and-discipline test, not a slippage model.

What Blue Guardian Futures Reviews Actually Say

Sentiment on Trustpilot and across prop firm review forums skews positive for Blue Guardian Futures, concentrated on support speed and payouts actually hitting accounts — the sharpest complaints cluster around traders getting caught by trailing drawdown mechanics they didn't fully map before trading live on the evaluation. That split is consistent, specific, and worth unpacking before you treat any single blue guardian futures review as gospel.

Recurring praise in reviewer feedback

Three things show up repeatedly in the positive reviews, almost word for word across different traders:

• Support turnaround — traders report getting a human response on live chat or ticket within hours, not days, including on weekends when CME markets are closed but questions still pile up.
• Payouts landing on schedule — the published 24-hour payout target gets confirmed repeatedly in reviews, with traders naming the exact day they requested and received funds.
• Rule clarity at purchase — several reviewers specifically call out that the drawdown and contract-size limits were stated upfront, not buried in a FAQ they had to dig for.

Recurring complaints and what causes them

The negative reviews are less scattered than you'd expect — most trace back to one mechanic: the intraday trailing drawdown moving against traders holding size overnight or during a fast leg on NQ or GC. A trader up $1,800 on the day who gives back $900 on a reversal can get stopped out by the trail even though their account is still net positive from the evaluation start. That's not a bug, it's how trailing drawdown is built, but it reads as a "rug pull" to someone who didn't model it before entering.

The second complaint cluster is smaller but louder: a handful of reports describe rule changes mid-evaluation. Worth noting — a single angry review from a trader who breached a published, pre-disclosed rule is noise, not signal. Repeated, dated reports of the same rule changing after purchase is signal. Scan for the pattern, not the adjective.

How to read prop firm review scores without fooling yourself

Prop firm reviews carry a structural bias you need to price in before trusting any aggregate score. The traders who show up to write a review are almost always at an emotional extreme — they just got paid, or they just got breached. The trader who's quietly three weeks into a funded account, trading their plan, has zero incentive to log into Trustpilot and leave five stars. That silent middle is the majority of accounts, and it never posts.

Run this checklist before you let any review swing your decision:

1. Filter by recency — rule sets and payout processes change; a review from 18 months ago tells you nothing about current terms.
2. Read the firm's public replies — does Blue Guardian Futures respond to breach complaints by pointing to the specific rule and date, or go silent?
3. Separate "I broke a rule" from "the rule changed" — only the second is evidence of a trust problem.
4. Weight volume, not just rating — a 4.6 average from 40 reviews is thinner evidence than a 4.3 average from 600.
5. Cross-check against your own read of the rulebook — reviews are a sanity check, not a substitute for knowing your trailing drawdown math cold.

Who Blue Guardian Futures Is For — and Who Should Avoid It

Blue Guardian Futures fits disciplined intraday scalpers who bank gains near the day's high and get uncomfortable the moment a winner starts giving profit back — it's a poor match for anyone whose edge depends on holding through the close or overnight. The intraday trailing drawdown model rewards traders who lock in R:R fast; it punishes the "let it run and see" style that works fine on a static end-of-day drawdown.

A good fit if you scalp ES or NQ intraday and bank quickly

Picture a 2-contract MES scalper working the London-into-NY overlap, targeting 1.5R per trade and flat by lunch. That trader almost never sees the trailing drawdown bite, because the trail locks in behind price as the account climbs — exits happen well before giveback becomes an issue. Same logic applies to NQ scalpers fading the opening range: quick in, quick out, trail stays comfortably behind. If your statistics show most of your edge realized within the first 90 minutes of a session, the trailing structure isn't a hazard, it's practically background noise.

A bad fit if you hold runners or swing CL overnight

Now picture a CL trader holding a position through an API inventory report or EIA data, expecting a multi-day leg. Every tick of open profit the trailing drawdown gives back tightens your ceiling — and if price does what crude often does (spike, retrace hard, then continue), you can get stopped out of a trade that would've worked on a static end-of-day drawdown. If your edge is built on swing entries, multi-day holds, or carrying positions past the close to capture a bigger leg, this is the rule that will bust you — not your market read.

Best alternatives in 2026 by trader type

• End-of-day drawdown seekers: if you hold overnight or swing futures positions, prioritize an end-of-day drawdown prop firm where the floor locks once at the daily close instead of trailing behind every intraday high.
• Cheapest-per-attempt seekers: if you're testing strategies across multiple accounts and attempt cost matters more than rule flexibility, shop the lower-tier evaluation fees among the best futures prop firms 2026 lists — Blue Guardian isn't positioned as the budget option.
• Multi-asset traders: if your bread and butter is XAUUSD or US100 and futures are a diversification play rather than your core edge, a platform built around a Two-Step Challenge spanning forex, gold, indices, and CME futures under one rulebook — like For Traders — saves you from learning a second firm's drawdown math just to add ES or GC exposure.

Honest case for For Traders here: it's strongest if your primary trading identity is gold or US indices and futures funding is an extension of a funded account you already understand, not a separate discipline. It's not the pick if you want the deepest futures-only contract menu with specialized micro and mini products across every CME product group — that's still Blue Guardian's and other futures-first firms' turf.

Verdict: Is Blue Guardian Futures Worth It in 2026?

Blue Guardian Futures is a credible mid-tier futures prop option — the payout record checks out, the main thing holding it back from a top-tier rating is the intraday trailing drawdown on evaluation accounts. If you're asking "is Blue Guardian Futures legit," the answer based on verified October 2026 rules is yes, with a specific caveat you need to trade around rather than a reason to walk away.

The scorecard

• Pricing: 7/10 — competitive against the futures-prop field, not the cheapest entry point but fair for what's included across ES, NQ, GC and CL.
• Rule flexibility: 6/10 — the intraday trailing drawdown is the sticking point; it moves with your equity peak during the session, which punishes traders who scale size mid-day more than an end-of-day model would.
• Payout reliability: 8/10 — the published 24-hour payout target held up in what we tracked, which is the single most important line item in any futures prop firm verdict 2026.
• Platform support: 7/10 — solid for traders already comfortable in a futures execution environment, less built-out if you're coming in cold with zero futures screen time.
• Transparency: 7/10 — rules are published and consistent with what support confirms, but the drawdown mechanics take real digging to fully understand before you fund your first evaluation.

Net: a solid mid-pack score, dragged down by one rule, not by the money side of the business.

What we'd want to see change

Two concrete asks would move this rating up a tier. First, an end-of-day drawdown option alongside the current intraday trailing model — this alone would resolve most of the friction traders report, since it removes the penalty for intraday equity swings that recover by the close. Second, a clearer published payout SLA with explicit timelines and escalation steps if the 24-hour target is missed, rather than relying on support-desk confirmation. Neither ask is about honesty — it's about reducing ambiguity before you commit capital to an evaluation.

How to test it with the smallest possible risk

Don't start with a $150K evaluation to find out if the trailing drawdown fits your style. Start at the smallest account size Blue Guardian Futures offers, and trade micros — MES, MNQ, MGC — for your first ten sessions minimum. This keeps your tick value low enough that a single bad fill or slippage event during NFP or FOMC doesn't blow the drawdown before you've learned how it actually tracks your equity curve intraday. Once you pass evaluation, treat the first payout cycle as your real due diligence — not the marketing page, not this review. A clean, on-time first payout tells you more about whether Blue Guardian Futures is legit than any rule sheet.

Rules here were verified in October 2026. Futures prop firms adjust drawdown models and payout terms often — recheck the current terms directly before funding an evaluation.

Blue Guardian Futures Pros and Cons

Pros

• Competitive evaluation pricing per dollar of simulated buying power versus most futures prop firms
• Mainstream platform and data-feed support — NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower and Rithmic-based routing
• Instant funding option for traders who want to skip the evaluation phase entirely
• Full CME menu that matters: ES, NQ, MES, MNQ, GC and CL
• Payout follow-through is well reported by reviewers once KYC is cleared

Cons / risks

• Intraday trailing drawdown on evaluations punishes traders who let open profit retrace
• The consistency rule can extend an otherwise-passed evaluation by weeks
• The 24-hour payout figure is a processing target from approval, not an end-to-end guarantee
• No unified multi-asset offering — forex and futures sit on separate rule sets and platforms
• Rules have changed over time, so the live rules page must be re-checked before purchase

Frequently Asked Questions