8 Best Funded Trading Firms for Crypto Traders

By Lenka Rož Schánová · Operations & Risk, For Traders

A crypto funded account is a simulated trading account issued by a prop trading firm after you pass a paid evaluation: you pay a challenge fee (from roughly $50), hit a profit target on simulated capital without breaching the daily loss limit or max drawdown, and then trade a funded account where you keep 80–90% of the simulated gains as performance rewards. You never deposit trading capital and you never risk your own coins.

Key takeaways

• A crypto funded account is not a loan or an investment — it's a challenge fee, a rules-based evaluation on simulated capital, and performance rewards paid from simulated profits.
• For Traders, FTMO and Hola Prime lead the 2026 crypto prop firm field on the combination of altcoin breadth, weekend access and payout speed; For Traders is the publisher of this ranking and is reviewed on the same criteria as everyone else.
• Two completely different questions get confused: getting funded to trade crypto (a challenge) versus funding a trading account with crypto (USDT/USDC as a deposit method) — most firms now do both.
• Static max drawdown survives normal 8–15% altcoin swings far better than a trailing drawdown that ratchets on unrealised equity highs.
• Your execution wrapper matters more than the firm's logo: crypto CFDs, perpetual swaps with 8-hourly funding, and CME Bitcoin futures (BTC/MBT) each punish a different strategy.
• Most crypto evaluations breach for three repeatable reasons — oversized alt positions, weekend holds into a Sunday gap, and revenge trades after an ETF-flow or FOMC spike.

Watch: related video

What is a crypto funded account and how does it actually work?

A crypto funded account is a simulated trading account issued by a crypto prop firm after you pay a challenge fee and pass an evaluation on simulated capital. You never deposit your own crypto. You trade a demo balance against a profit target, a daily loss limit, and a max drawdown — clear those hurdles and the firm allocates you a funded account where you keep a performance rewards split, typically 80-90% of the simulated gains.

The mechanism in four steps: fee, evaluation, funded account, rewards

Every crypto funded trading account follows the same skeleton, whether the firm markets it as one-step or two-step. Take a $50,000 simulated account as the working example:

1. Fee. You pay a challenge fee — often $50-$500 depending on account size and firm — to unlock the evaluation.
2. Evaluation. You trade the simulated $50,000 balance and need to hit an 8% phase-one profit target while respecting a 5% daily loss limit and a 10% max drawdown. Breach either limit and the evaluation resets or ends.
3. Funded account. Pass the target (and phase two, if the program has one) and the firm issues a funded account — still simulated capital, but now live-tracked with real payout obligations on the firm's side.
4. Rewards. Your simulated gains get calculated at the agreed profit split, and you receive performance rewards as a cash payout, usually in USDT/USDC or via bank transfer.

Simulated capital vs your own exchange account

Trading your own Binance or Coinbase balance means the capital is yours, the liquidation risk is yours, and there's no evaluation gatekeeping you — you can blow up your own wallet on leverage with nobody stopping you. A crypto funded account flips that: the daily loss limit and max drawdown exist precisely so the firm's simulated capital survives your bad days. You're being tested on discipline and risk control on someone else's balance sheet, not growing your own coin stack directly.

What a crypto funded account is not

No prop firm is a broker, and passing an evaluation doesn't mean anyone wires you cash to trade freely. It's not a copy-trading pool where your fills mirror a lead trader's book, it's not a signal group charging for entries, and it's not an "investor funds you" arrangement where a stranger deposits real capital into your control. A crypto prop firm issues simulated capital, tracks your performance against rules, and pays performance rewards when you earn them — that's the entire transaction.

"Can someone fund my crypto trading?" vs "Can I fund a trading account with crypto?"

Google mashes these two questions together, but they're asking completely different things. One is about getting capital to trade — the other is about how you pay for and get paid from your challenge. Let's untangle both.

Can someone fund my crypto trading? The honest answer

Yes — but through a paid evaluation with hard rules, not a handshake with a private investor. A crypto prop trading firm will hand you access to simulated capital, sometimes six figures worth, once you've proven you can trade inside a defined risk box: daily loss limit, max drawdown, profit target, minimum trading days depending on the challenge type. That's the whole mechanism behind trading accounts funded with cryptocurrency — you're not borrowing someone's real coins, and nobody's wiring capital into your personal exchange wallet. You're trading a firm's simulated account, and once you clear the rules, you get paid performance rewards from that firm's own capital pool, not from a stranger's deposit.

Can I fund a trading account with crypto (USDT/USDC deposits)?

Yes — in 2026, most major firms accept USDT and USDC to pay your challenge fee, and pay your performance rewards back the same way. This is a crypto funding account in the literal sense: you fund the entry fee with stablecoins on ERC-20, TRC-20, or Solana rails, and the firm settles your rewards back to a wallet on the same network. TRC-20 (Tron) is usually the cheapest route — fees often sit under $1 — while ERC-20 (Ethereum mainnet) can run several dollars depending on gas conditions, and Solana sits somewhere in between with fast finality. None of this touches your trading account balance; it's purely the rails for moving fee-in, reward-out.

Getting paid out in crypto: networks, fees and processing times

Crypto payouts on a legitimate funded program typically clear in 8–48 hours after your reward request is approved — much faster than a bank wire, and with none of the currency conversion friction. The catch that trips people up: your payout wallet address has to match the identity on file from your KYC. Firms won't push stablecoins to a random address you paste in at the last second — that mismatch is one of the most common reasons a payout gets held for manual review. Pick your network before you request payout, confirm the wallet is under your own name, and expect the firm to ask for it again during KYC if you haven't already provided it.

Red flags: the "private investor" funding scam pattern

Here's where the two questions collide dangerously. Anyone who slides into your DMs promising to deposit real capital into your own exchange account, in exchange for an upfront "security deposit" — that's not a crypto funded account, that's a scam. Same goes for anyone demanding your exchange API keys "just to verify" or "to manage the account for you." A real crypto prop firm never needs your API keys, never asks you to receive funds into your personal wallet before trading, and never calls itself an investor. If the pitch involves your own account, your own keys, or a stranger's "capital," walk away — that's the pattern, every time.

Crypto funded account comparison 2026: all 8 firms, same fields

Eight firms, one table, zero marketing spin — that's the goal here. Every crypto prop firm claims to be "trader-first," but the fields that actually decide whether you get paid are buried in fine print most traders never read until it costs them a payout.

How we scored these funded trading firms

We built this crypto prop firm comparison around eight fields that move the needle on real trading, not marketing copy: altcoin coverage beyond BTC/ETH, 24/7 or weekend market access, how funding-rate and overnight costs get charged on the demo book, whether news trading during high-volatility windows is actually permitted (not just tolerated), drawdown model (static vs trailing), profit split, payout speed, and whether the challenge fee gets refunded on your first payout. That last one matters more than most traders realize — a $150 fee refunded on payout one is effectively a free evaluation; a fee you never see again is a sunk cost baked into every firm's business model.

Instant disqualification criteria

Before a firm made this list, it had to clear four filters. Fail any one and it's out, regardless of how aggressive the profit split looks:

• No public rule documentation. If the drawdown rules, daily loss limit, or payout terms live only in a support chat reply, that's not a rulebook — it's a negotiation the firm wins every time.
• No verifiable payout record. Screenshots on a landing page aren't proof. We looked for third-party payout verification or a track record traders can actually cross-check.
• Trailing drawdown stacked with a sub-5% daily loss limit on crypto. Crypto's intraday range makes this combination close to unpassable — a single BTC wick can end your evaluation before you've placed three trades.
• Fee-only business models with no funded trader base. If a firm's revenue is 100% challenge fees with no visible funded traders drawing performance rewards, the incentive structure is backwards.

The comparison table

Same eight fields, same order, every row. Pull whatever you need — the numbers below reflect published program terms as of September 2026 and are stamped for that reason: firms revise terms often, so re-check before you buy a challenge.

Table last updated September 2026.

The top 3 crypto funded account providers in 2026

If you're weighing a crypto funded account right now, these three are the ones worth putting your card down for — each wins a different fight, and none of them wins every fight. Here's the honest breakdown.

1. For Traders — best all-round crypto funded account

For Traders runs a dedicated Crypto Challenge alongside its standard Two-Step Challenge and Instant Funding product, so you pick the evaluation path that fits your risk appetite rather than being forced into one structure.

• Instruments: BTC, ETH, and a solid altcoin bench covering the majors — enough to run momentum and range strategies, though not the 200+ pairs you'd get on a native exchange.
• Evaluation: Two-Step targets are staged to reward consistency over lucky legs; Instant Funding skips the eval entirely for traders who want to start funded crypto trader status day one.
• Drawdown: Static, calculated from your starting balance — no trailing floor chasing your equity curve as you scale up.
• Weekend rules: Weekend trading is permitted on crypto, which matters since BTC and ETH don't stop moving on Saturday just because CME futures close.
• Split & payouts: Performance rewards paid in USDT/USDC, keeping settlement crypto-native rather than routing through a bank wire.
• Fee: Fee from roughly $50, and it's refunded on your first payout — a real cost offset most competitors don't match.
• Where it falls short: the altcoin list is narrower than a native exchange, and Instant Funding carries a higher fee per unit of simulated capital than the staged Two-Step path.

Best for: traders who want crypto-native flexibility — weekend access, static risk, and a refundable fee — without hunting across multiple products.

2. FTMO — best for traders who want a long track record

FTMO crypto access sits inside a firm with one of the longest operating histories in the prop space, and that history shows in how tightly documented every rule is.

• Instruments: BTC and ETH primarily — fewer alts than the crypto-focused challengers, so altcoin swing traders will feel the ceiling.
• Evaluation: Standard two-phase structure with well-worn, thoroughly tested targets — no surprises buried in fine print.
• Drawdown: Documented clearly, with rules that are strict but predictable — you know exactly where the line is before you place a trade.
• Weekend rules: Limited weekend exposure compared to crypto-native firms.
• Split & payouts: Competitive split, payout cycle in line with industry norms rather than aggressive fast-track windows.
• Fee: Fee from mid-range relative to the group.
• Where it falls short: crypto feels like an add-on to a forex-first firm — the alt selection lags firms built crypto-first.

Best for: traders who prioritize track record and rule clarity over instrument breadth.

3. Hola Prime — best for fast, frequent payouts

Hola Prime built its reputation on payout speed — if your priority is getting performance rewards out the door quickly, this is the name that comes up.

• Instruments: BTC, ETH plus a growing alt list.
• Evaluation: Straightforward targets, less battle-tested than FTMO given the firm's shorter operating history.
• Drawdown: Static model, comparable to the crypto-native peers.
• Weekend rules: Generally open on crypto pairs.
• Split & payouts: Aggressive payout cadence — among the fastest turnaround windows in this list.
• Fee: Fee from competitive with the mid-tier of the group.
• Where it falls short: newer track record means less long-run data on how the firm behaves under stress or scale.

Best for: traders who value cash-flow speed over long-run institutional history.

Five more funded trading firms crypto traders should compare

4. Breakout — crypto-native perpetuals evaluation

Best data point: Breakout builds its evaluation around perpetual swaps rather than bolting crypto onto a forex-first model, so order flow, funding rates, and fill behavior mirror what you'd see on a live perp exchange.

• Instruments: Perpetual swaps on major and mid-cap crypto, no CFD wrapper layered on top.
• Split & payouts: Standard 80/20 split scaling toward 90/10 with consistent performance.
• Fee: Mid-pack entry fee for a single evaluation phase.
• Where it falls short: Uses a trailing drawdown that follows your equity curve up — a strong session can tighten your buffer faster than a static drawdown model would.
• Best for: traders who already think in perp mechanics — funding rate, basis, mark price — and want an evaluation that doesn't force them to translate.

5. FundedNext — widest altcoin CFD list

Best data point: FundedNext's crypto CFD list runs deep past Bitcoin and Ethereum into SOL, XRP, ADA, and DOGE, giving swing traders more uncorrelated setups inside a single funded crypto trading account.

• Instruments: Broad altcoin CFD roster alongside majors.
• Split & payouts: Up to 90% split with bi-weekly payout option.
• Fee: Competitive relative to the breadth of instruments offered.
• Where it falls short: Thin liquidity on the smaller alts can widen spreads and slippage exactly when volatility spikes and you need a clean fill.
• Best for: traders running altcoin rotation strategies who need more than BTC/ETH to build a diversified book.

6. Crypto Fund Trader — 24/7 crypto-only specialist

Best data point: Crypto Fund Trader keeps evaluations open through weekends and holidays — no Sunday gap risk sitting untouched — which matters for a market that never actually closes.

• Instruments: Crypto-only book, no forex or index distraction.
• Split & payouts: Up to 90% split, on-request payout cycle.
• Fee: Entry-level pricing among crypto-only prop firms.
• Where it falls short: Consistency rules cap how much any single trading day can contribute to your overall profit target, which punishes traders who rely on one outsized weekend move.
• Best for: traders who actively manage positions through weekends and don't want their strategy penalized for trading when the market's actually open.

7. Apex Trader Funding — CME Bitcoin and Micro Bitcoin futures

Best data point: Apex runs its crypto exposure through CME Bitcoin futures and the MBT micro contract, giving you regulated, exchange-cleared exposure instead of an OTC CFD wrapper.

• Instruments: CME Bitcoin futures and MBT micros, plus the broader futures menu.
• Split & payouts: 90/10 split, no time limit on hitting targets.
• Fee: Low monthly-style pricing typical of the futures evaluation model.
• Where it falls short: Tick-value discipline is non-negotiable — MBT moves in fixed dollar increments per tick, and traders coming from CFD or perp sizing habits misjudge position size until it costs them a challenge.
• Best for: traders who want a regulated, exchange-cleared route into crypto exposure and are comfortable with futures contract mechanics.

8. The5ers — best for slow, low-frequency swing traders

Best data point: The5ers sets a low-pressure profit target with no time limit, built for traders who take a handful of high-conviction crypto swings a month rather than grinding daily volume.

• Instruments: Crypto CFDs alongside forex and indices.
• Split & payouts: Starts around 50% but scales toward 100% as your funded account grows.
• Fee: Mid-range, reflecting the low-pressure structure.
• Where it falls short: Scaling is genuinely slow — reaching the top-tier splits takes sustained months of results, not a single strong evaluation.
• Best for: patient swing traders who'd rather compound slowly through a crypto prop firm than chase an aggressive payout cadence.

Crypto CFDs vs perpetual swaps vs CME Bitcoin futures: which wrapper fits your strategy

Same chart, same entry, different P&L — the wrapper you trade decides how much of your edge survives contact with costs. Crypto CFDs charge spread and an overnight swap that widens in thin liquidity, perpetual swaps clip you with a funding rate every 8 hours, and CME Bitcoin futures trade fixed sessions with basis to spot that can gap on the Sunday reopen. Pick the wrong one for your holding period and you're not failing the strategy — you're failing the plumbing.

Crypto CFDs: simplest fills, spread and swap costs

Crypto CFDs are the default on most challenge platforms because the fill mechanics are dead simple: one price, one spread, no expiry to manage. That simplicity has a cost — you pay the spread on entry and exit, plus an overnight swap for every night you hold. On BTC that swap compounds fast if you're carrying a position through a weekend, and Sunday evening liquidity is exactly when spreads on crypto CFDs blow out, sometimes 3-4x their weekday width. If you're an intraday breakout trader closing everything before the New York close, CFDs are the cleanest wrapper you'll find — no funding clock, no roll date, just spread.

Perpetual swaps: 8-hourly funding rates and carry cost

Perpetual swaps don't have expiry, so instead they charge or pay a funding rate every 8 hours to keep the contract price tethered to spot. In a crowded, one-directional market — think everyone long BTC into a rally — that funding rate can run persistently positive, and you're paying it three times a day just to stay in the trade. A multi-day swing position that looks fine on the chart can bleed 1-2% of notional in funding alone over a week. Perps reward traders who are either flat by the funding timestamp or trading with the crowd's funding bias, not against it.

CME Bitcoin futures (BTC and MBT): basis, contango and session gaps

CME Bitcoin futures — full-size BTC and the smaller MBT micro bitcoin futures — trade in defined sessions with a settlement tied to the CME reference rate, not a continuous spot feed. That means basis: the futures price sits above or below spot, usually in contango, and that gap narrows toward the roll date. Miss the roll and you're marking a contract nobody wants anymore. The bigger risk for challenge traders is the Sunday-evening reopen — after the weekend gap in spot crypto, CME futures can open at a level that jumps clean through a resting stop, no fills in between. Tick value matters here too: MBT's smaller tick makes position sizing more forgiving for a smaller funded account than the full BTC contract.

The crypto rules that actually decide whether you pass

Two numbers end more crypto challenges than bad entries ever do: your daily loss limit and whether your max drawdown is static or trailing. Get the arithmetic wrong on either and a normal SOL retrace turns into a breach notice, not a losing trade you shake off.

Static vs trailing max drawdown on 8–15% altcoin swings

A static max drawdown is fixed to your starting balance — breach a $5,000 floor on a $50,000 account and you're out, but every dollar of profit widens your real cushion. A trailing max drawdown ratchets up with your equity high-water mark, which means the floor rises the moment you're in profit and can catch you on the very next pullback.

Here's why that matters specifically for crypto: altcoins like SOL, AVAX or DOGE routinely move 8–15% intraday on nothing more than a BTC dominance shift or a liquidation cascade. A trader up $3,000 on a trailing-drawdown account has just dragged their floor up by $3,000. A completely ordinary 10% pullback in an alt position can now breach an account that would have survived comfortably under static rules.

Daily loss limit maths and position sizing for BTC, ETH and alts

Take a $50,000 simulated account with a 4% daily loss limit — that's $2,000 of room before you're locked out for the day. If SOL is running a 9% session range, a naive full-size position blows through that limit on a single leg against you. Back into position size instead: risking 1% ($500) per trade with a stop set at 1.5× ATR below entry on a $150 SOL price and an ATR of $6 gives you a $9 stop distance, which caps your position at roughly 55 SOL — not the round-number size your gut wants to trade. Do the same maths before every session change, because ATR on alts moves week to week in a way it rarely does on EUR/USD.

Weekend trading and the Sunday gap protocol

Crypto trades 24/7, but liquidity doesn't — spreads widen through the weekend and Sunday's reopen can gap through resting stops. Your protocol should scale with the firm's gap rules: if weekend positions are permitted, cut size by half going into Friday close, widen stops to account for the gap rather than tightening them, and never leave a position sized for weekday ATR sitting through a weekend session. If a firm restricts or disallows weekend holds, flatten before Friday's close — full stop, no exceptions, no "it'll probably be fine."

News windows: FOMC, CPI and spot Bitcoin ETF flow spikes

FOMC volatility and CPI prints move BTC and ETH just as hard as they move indices now — correlation with risk assets has only tightened since spot Bitcoin ETF flows became a daily liquidity driver. Large net inflows or redemptions on the ETF side can produce the kind of directional spike that blows a daily loss limit in minutes if you're holding size into the print. Some firms restrict opening new positions in the minutes around scheduled releases like FOMC statements or CPI data; check your firm's news-trading rule before you assume you can trade through it, and treat ETF flow days with the same respect you'd give a Fed decision.

What a crypto funded account really costs in 2026

A crypto funded account cost isn't the sticker price on the checkout page — it's challenge fee, plus the reset you'll probably need, minus the refund you get if you clear it. Sticker prices on a $50,000 two-step evaluation typically land between $250 and $400 across the industry; Instant Funding on the same size runs meaningfully higher, often $600-$900, because you're paying to skip the evaluation gate entirely.

Fee ranges by account size and evaluation type

Fees scale roughly linearly with account size, not exponentially — a $200,000 two-step evaluation usually costs 3-4x a $50,000 one, not 10x. Rough bands you'll see across firms in 2026:

• $10,000-$25,000 accounts: $60-$150 for two-step, $150-$250 for Instant Funding
• $50,000 accounts: $250-$400 for two-step, $600-$900 for Instant Funding
• $100,000-$200,000 accounts: $500-$900 for two-step, $1,200-$2,000+ for Instant Funding

Three-step challenges usually sit slightly below two-step pricing for the same size because the profit target per phase is lower, spreading the difficulty (and the fee) across an extra leg. If you're weighing which structure fits your crypto trading style, this is the moment to price the whole path rather than the entry ticket — the cheapest fee on paper isn't the cheapest way to get funded if it comes with a tighter daily loss limit that gets you reset twice.

Resets, retries and the true cost of a second attempt

Most traders don't pass a crypto challenge cleanly on the first run — crypto's volatility means a daily loss limit breach on a bad BTC leg is common even for disciplined traders. A reset fee usually runs 40-60% of the original challenge fee rather than a full new purchase, but it's still real money stacked on top of the sticker price. Do the blended math: a $300 evaluation plus one $150 reset puts your true cost of a passed account closer to $450, not $300. That's the number to compare across firms, not the headline fee alone.

Fee refunds on first payout and what voids them

Many firms, For Traders included, refund the original challenge fee once you hit your first payout on the funded account — effectively making the evaluation free if you trade it through. But the refund is conditional, and the conditions are where traders get caught out:

• A rule breach on the funded stage after you've passed can void the pending refund
• Using a reset resets the refund eligibility clock along with the account
• Withdrawing below the firm's minimum payout threshold on your first request can disqualify the refund trigger

Read the challenge fee refund clause before you assume it's automatic — it's usually tied to a clean pass and a qualifying first withdrawal, not just reaching funded status.

Last piece: the payout cycle. Bi-weekly cycles are still the norm for a best funded account setup, but on-demand payout options are spreading fast in the crypto-futures space, with some firms processing stablecoin withdrawals in under 24 hours versus multi-day bank rails. Pair that against your profit split — 80/90 splits are standard now — and the real cost-to-reward ratio becomes clear once you factor in how fast you actually see the money.

How to start crypto prop trading: your first 30 days, step by step

Direct answer: if you're figuring out how to start crypto prop trading, the first 30 days come down to eight moves — pick your execution wrapper, size down, write a risk plan you'll actually follow, pass phase one on your best two setups, survive phase two without rushing, get KYC done before it blocks a payout, take your first payout early, and only scale after three clean cycles. Treat it like a checklist, not a vibe.

Steps 1–3: pick your wrapper, size the account, write the risk plan

Step 1 — choose the execution wrapper that matches the timeframe you already trade. If you scalp 5-minute charts on BTC and ETH, a crypto-futures wrapper with tight spreads and 24/7 fills suits you better than a spot-style CFD account with wider slippage windows. Don't switch your trading style to fit the product — switch the product to fit your style.

Step 2 — size down. A $25,000 or $50,000 simulated account you can actually pass beats a $200,000 account you blow in week one on oversized position sizing. Ego sizing kills more evaluations than bad entries do. Start small, prove consistency, let the scaling plan do the heavy lifting later.

Step 3 — define max risk per trade at 0.5–1% of the simulated balance, and set a hard daily stop at half the firm's stated daily loss limit. If the daily loss limit is 5%, you stop trading at 2.5% — full stop, no exceptions, no "one more trade to get it back." This buffer is what keeps one bad session from ending the evaluation.

Steps 4–6: pass phase one, survive phase two, get verified

Step 4 — trade only your two highest-conviction setups through evaluation phase 1. This isn't the time to test new strategies. Phase one rewards repetition of what already works for you, not creativity.

Step 5 — treat phase two as a consistency test, not a sprint. Firms watch for the same discipline over more trading days here, not a faster profit target. Slow down, keep position sizing identical to phase one, and resist the urge to press once you smell verification.

Step 6 — complete KYC verification before you need it, not after you've hit target and are waiting on a funded account. Upload ID and proof of address in week one so the paperwork isn't the thing standing between you and getting funded.

Steps 7–8: first payout and the scaling plan

Step 7 — take the first payout early, even if it's small, to validate the withdrawal rails before you're relying on the money. A test payout confirms KYC cleared, the stablecoin or bank rail works, and the split lands as advertised.

Step 8 — scale only after three consecutive profitable payout cycles. That's the real proof you can become a funded crypto trader long-term, not just pass one evaluation on a hot streak. Three cycles smooths out variance and shows the risk plan holds under different market conditions before you push size.

For Traders Crypto Challenge: honest pros and cons

Pros

• Static max drawdown rather than a trailing model — normal 8–15% altcoin retraces don't automatically end the account
• Weekend crypto trading permitted, so 24/7 swing positions aren't forced flat on Friday
• Challenge fee refunded with the first payout on qualifying accounts
• Multiple routes to the same funded account: Crypto Challenge, Two-Step Challenge or Instant Funding for traders who won't sit an evaluation
• USDT and USDC accepted for the fee and available for performance-reward payouts
• Multi-asset access means the same account can trade XAUUSD and US indices when crypto ranges go dead

Cons / risks

• Altcoin list is narrower than a native crypto exchange — deep small-cap alt traders will feel the gap
• Instant Funding costs meaningfully more per unit of simulated capital than the two-step route
• No perpetual-swap funding-rate carry to trade as a strategy in its own right
• Like every prop firm, the pass rate is low — the evaluation is a real filter, not a formality
• All challenge trading is on simulated capital, which some traders coming from live exchange accounts find behaviourally different

Frequently Asked Questions